We read in this week’s parsha, “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” (Shmot 21, 24). We know that the oral tradition here (Bava Kama 83b) is that the Torah is referring to monetary compensation for the harm inflicted, but the question remains, so why is it written otherwise? The Rambam (Chovel u’Mazik 1, 3) famously explains that it must be written eternally that literally an “eye for an eye” is what deserves (!) to be done to the cruel offender. But less known is the SHADAL’s commentary: One may rarely come across a particularly cruel person, who is not deterred even by a heavy monetary fine. The Torah states that for such a monster, the judges should know that the literal meaning must sometimes be carried out. In Hamas we have found such cruelty, that we have no choice but to deter them in their “own language”. As former Foreign Minister David Levy once said, “we must speak to our enemies in the Arabic which they understand”.
Our national poet Bialik wrote after the 1903/תרס”ג pogroms in Kishinev: “Satan has yet to create appropriate revenge for the murder of an infant”, but that doesn’t exempt us from the military necessity and moral obligation to deter our enemies to protect our children in the future. Similar to the Shadal, Rav Kook (Ma’amarei HaReiya, p. 508) explains the seemingly extreme revenge which David HaMelech occasionally did to his enemies, in that governments MUST deter every generation’s foes in their own dialect, in the way they wish to do to us. If they are primitive, we deter them accordingly, if they think of nuking us, we must develop nuclear weapons before they do.
I’m not saying that we should mutilate and cold-bloodedly murder their children and rape their women like they do to us (I don’t even think we are capable of such sadism), nor should we play joyful music when handing over their dead bodies, but if they think of obliterating us, we have no choice but to seriously consider how to remove them from Gaza. What undoubtedly will hurt them most would be to reestablish Gush Katif there and teach that not only “crime doesn’t pay”, in fact it will bring them tremendous loss, precisely in the field which they wish to gain. Menachem Begin used to build a Jewish Yishuv where terrorists killed Jews.
Just last night, terrorists placed 4 bombs on Israeli buses, which miraculously, they mistakenly set for the wrong time, and were either found or blew-up empty. Our enemies have simply yet to be deterred.
As we mentioned above, like the Bibas boys, David Melech Yisrael was also a Jinjy (Red-head) and his fiery traits must be Chai v’Kayam (alive and exist forever, Birkat HaL’vana). Just as Rivka taught Ya’akov that sometimes we must don Esav’s arms both literally and figuratively (Rav Kook, Midbar Shur, pp. 266-272), and even Shakespeare depicted the Jewish Shylock and Fagin as red-heads, now is that time for us to act “Jinjy”. Josephus quotes the Roman soldiers who feared the Jewish warrior more than any other. In fact, Rav Kook writes that the fiery chutzpa of youth is why the Mashiach is even called “the SON of David”, for feisty youth are the most flaming (Orot HaKodesh, iii, p. 361). We must dare get-even in the way which will daunt any future contemplation of our annihilation. We are no longer in Kishinev. That is positive retaliation, by doing Hashem’s commandment and self-fulfilling His prophecy: “You shall inherit the Land, and settle it” (Bamidbar 33, 53). Thus declaring: We are here to stay and if you’re forcing someone to leave, it will be you. Shabbat Shalom! Rav Ari Shvat (Chwat)